Evaluating Nonfiction Children's Literature for Science
Guidelines
Accuracy and authenticity
• Is the author qualified to write about this topic? Has the manuscript
been checked by authorities in the field?
• Are the facts accurate according to other sources?
• Is the information up-to-date?
• Are all the significant facts included?
• Do text and illustrations reveal diversity and avoid stereotypes?
• Are generalizations supported by facts?
• Is there a clear distinction between fact and theory?
• Do text and illustrations omit anthropomorphism and teleological
explanations?
Content and perspective
• For what purpose was the book designed?
• Is the book within the comprehension and interest range of its
intended audience?
• Is the subject adequately covered? Are different viewpoints
presented?
• Does the book lead to an understanding of the scientific method?
Does it foster the spirit of inquiry?
• Does the book show interrelationships? Do science books indicate
related social issues?
Style
• Is information presented clearly and directly?
• Is the text appropriate for the intended audience?
• Does the style create the feeling of reader involvement?
• Is the language vivid and interesting?
Organization
• Is the information structured clearly, with appropriate subheadings?
• Does the book have reference aids that are clear and easy to use,
such as a table of contents, index, bibliography, glossary, appendix?
Illustrations and format
• Do the illustrations clarify and extend the text or speak plainly for
themselves?
• Are size relationships made clear?
• Are media suitable to the purposes for which they are used?
• Are illustrations explained by captions or labels where needed?
• Does the total format contribute to the clarity and attractiveness of
the book?
* Guidelines taken from Kiefer and Tyson, Charlotte Huck’s Children’s Literature: A brief guide, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010.
